Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Interlude I: William Matthew McClane on Nathaniel Bartholomew Baird




Painting Nathan Baird’s actions and practices within the ‘O’, or at CS Hawkins, as unique to ‘Nathan Baird’ would create a false image.  The role of ‘Chief of Staff’, as well as the manic enthusiasms of the couple of Deputies, whom they select to cluster, runs back to the beginning of the O’s history. The students, who sought the power of the Tai-Pan, learned quickly to use trusted lieutenants to organize the Organization and then make the Tai-Pan’s personal appeal to all students from the varying high schools about Hendersonville and the immediately neighboring cities.
In fact, Jamie Addison (the 2nd Tai-Pan) served in effect as the Chief of Staff for Timothy Charleson. Martin Burke (the 7th Tai-Pan) first organized the staff of Andy Wilson (the 6th Tai-Pan). One indelible mark, however, which Nathan left on the ‘O’, partly due to his rather unique situation as well as lack of desire (in that he never challenged Richard), remains not succeeding to the role of Tai-Pan. That task should have fallen to Peter.
One can nonetheless draw a direct line from the past Tai-Pans practices to the present day beginning only with the 71st Tai-Pan: Troy Milton, a rather large boy with glossy chestnut hair. His career in the ‘O’ began as a sophomore Chief of Staff for James Bardeaux.  Milton meticulously kept Bardeaux’s schedule and ran a very tight ship.  When Troy found zeal he thought deficient, he personally signed a Circular (internal memo) exhorting his own Deputy “to push things.”
The connection from Troy Milton to Nathaniel Baird stretches for generations as well as the many other Chiefs of Staffs, who all made “their mark” on the Organization’s history.  Nathan Baird, however, probably proved the ablest of them all – and different (though, understandably, I might be somewhat biased here; I recruited him after-all). So, though, were the students’ lives by the time of our Administration. So, too, were the professional touches the ‘O’ required at that time. Like Troy Milton learned, Nathan too learned (all too quickly) that one had “to push things.”
The Organization does not recognize any conflict between ends and means.  The ends forever remain to win, to obtain victory, and, as in war, the means do not matter. The ‘O’ will not tolerate and has never tolerated the squeamish – and that will forever remain its dark underside.
A man of great charm when friendly and total ruthlessness when frustrated, Nathaniel Baird becomes quite impressive in either mood.  Lithe, graceful, his body moving with an athlete’s suppleness, soft of voice (when required) but capable of booming presence (when needed), Nathan was far more handsome with his dirty blond hair cut long than when he (occasionally) wore it crewcut  and flat-topped, and he could terrify the Organization either way when necessary.
The Bairds had become an established (if not broken) family by the time Nathan attended CS Hawkins.  He was sixteen generation Tennessean, and his mother’s side of the family had lived for centuries in the mountainous regions between Tennessee and Kentucky. Above all, however, the Bairds – and Nathan – were patriots.
Nathaniel Baird, as remembered by his family and friends (me among them), did not enjoy “politics,” nor had he become particularly active locally. He did volunteer, when time permitted, for community service (though not generally known to this day), and he thoroughly enjoyed his time playing soccer – football, as he would insist – as well as marching band and debate.  If he had any institutional commitments while in high school, then those commitments remained narrowly focused on those three institutions.
To the outside observer, Nathan possessed many intriguing qualities within his personality.  He had his endless work ethic, that sharp and quick mind with an insatiable desire to learn and almost encyclopedic recall.  He also had that professional administrator’s approach, which caused one student (whose name escapes me at the moment) to remark after his first meeting with Nathan “oh yes, he knows what the ‘O’ is all right, but does he know what it’s all about?”  But, as we would come to learn over the next four years, Nathan probably understood its purpose better than any one of us.
Loyalty stood out as the first and foremost of these qualities. Loyalty to his family, his relationships, his Country, his school – that is, to his vision of an efficient, well-ordered structure within the liberty and autonomy to act as needed (almost an outright contradiction).  Jeff Williams, one of his oldest friends, remembers, for example, Nathan’s devotion to marching band and his straightforward commitment of energy, talent, skills, and outreach, which prompted Jeff to remember Nathaniel with a personal fondness and admiration that make almost schizophrenic his abhorrence to what Nathan later became – what he had to become – to defeat the Cowboys.
Once part of the ‘O’, Nathan’s loyalty ran ultimately to Tai-Pan Richard Holst, above all other institutional loyalties (only Gwen, Suzanne, and Mel could and occasionally did trump it).  “Once he accepted the role, he became totally committed,” Jeff remarked to me one day. “A clear-cut case of hero worship, if I ever saw one, almost a wedding of minds.”  Nathan’s basic loyalty went to the man not the ‘O’, and certainly not even to the traditional processes of the required interactions. Holst became the institution during those turbulent times, and Nathan came to believe Richard remained absolutely indispensable to the future of the Organization.
To this quality of loyalty, I must add Nathan’s second quality: an almost blindingly puritanical discipline that governed his personal life, which affected the way he viewed other people.  He proved totally incorruptible, and possessed an unbending interpretation of what was “right” and what was “wrong.” He thus rigidly froze with his stinging sarcasm all those about him, whom he came to see failing in this respect.  It also led to many reckless and fool hearty actions on his part – and when faced with an impossible decision, it would cost him … dearly.  I still remain dumbfounded that Shane Phelps saw this quality first.
In addition to his loyalty and, for lack of a better term, self-righteousness, Nathan possessed a third quality: his intellectual preoccupation with technique. Rigid self-righteousness coupled with the cold, mechanical techniques of management could make Nathan the Man-of-Terror he became within the Organization during its greatest challenges in the aftermath of hurricane Alycia: unforgiving, cruel, and above all inflexible.  Only Mel would show capable of bending Nathan’s will there; something I think far too many overlook, when they side with Suzanne.
Nathan set the “inner style” of the ‘O’ within two weeks of accepting my invitation. It only took two more weeks for that style to move into full swing.  That style reflected Richard Holst, to be sure, and the man he ultimately chose as his first minister became Nathaniel Bartholomew Baird.  On a personal level, however, Richard could prove engaging, emotive, as well as remarkably kind and generous, and he could crack a mean joke.
"I can't seem to remember anything funny" probably remains one the most innocuous, self-reflective comments Nathan made to me after a staff meeting during those early days. "It's a definite failing I have. I can't even remember a good joke." Odd, considering Nathan loved to laugh.  Jon and I, on the other hand, soon had a running joke around Nathan, whenever he launched some "project" of the Tai-Pan: "It's yet another race between success and a cardiac."
“He doesn’t want to organize,” Nathan said of the Tai-Pan, “he needs to be organized.” Nathan simply proceeded to do what Richard Holst needed. And, yes, I fully supported Nathan in that respect.
Nathan saw to it everything was organized.
He organized ideas; he organized reactions, he organized the staff (and ruthlessly re-organized it when needed); he organized the Tai-Pan’s schedule; he organized the dissemination of the Tai-Pan’s desires; he organized how the Tai-Pan executed orders – in effect he organized the Organization to levels never before seen.  To accomplish this, Nathan needed to step on toes.  Unfortunately, this also meant that anything, which might have needed a light touch, would soon find itself crushed into superorganized pulp.
Once Nathan established himself, nothing went directly to the Tai-Pan ... ever.  Requests, suggestions, and appointments became "staffed out," which, to Nathan, meant "studied by the staff and, if possible, decided at a lower level," but sometimes would come to mean "responsibility irretrievably spread." Nevertheless, Nathan invited and sometimes demanded dissenting opinions. If you told Nathan something you could rest assured it went to the Tai-Pan persuasively, reduced to the essentials -- and that was Nathan's greatest talent and his most important role.
To their adventure together in the Organization, both Richard and Nathan would develop an almost unspoken code: the whole concept of “control.” They both had a belief that events can be, must be managed.
… and then came along the Cowboys.

No comments:

Post a Comment